Dhamma · Reflection · Statements · Peaceful Communication
Archive and publication page · Use Search, Topics, or the Month & Year archive to locate related materials.

Office Of Siridantamahapalaka: TK-030 Template Title: Sensitive Info Leaked in Process (C/G) — Access Mapping + Data Handling Rule

Chronological Archive

TK-030 Template Title: Sensitive Info Leaked in Process (C/G) — Access Mapping + Data Handling Rule

 

THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-030

Template Title: Sensitive Info Leaked in Process (C/G) — Access Mapping + Data Handling Rule

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster:
Cluster C (Institution-Building & Records Discipline) / Cluster G (Neglect risk, weak controls, loss through poor handling)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-023 Verbal-to-written confirmation SOP (if leak was via calls)

  • TK-029 Evidence Package Template (if evidence was overshared)

  • T31 Chain-of-Custody Log (for sensitive items)

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (Safeguarding & Integrity)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
☑ Internal only ☐ Restricted ☐ Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive

Use of this form (tick):
☐ New case / action ☑ Follow-up ☐ Annual review ☐ Archive only


TK-030 — SENSITIVE INFO LEAKED IN PROCESS (C/G)

(Who accessed + data handling rule)


1. Purpose

Use TK-030 when sensitive information is leaked during an administrative process, such as:

  • names, phone numbers, addresses,

  • relic location, storage method,

  • donor identities and amounts,

  • internal conflict details,

  • draft letters, evidence packages, screenshots.

This template helps HSWAGATA to:

  • map who accessed the info,

  • stop further spread,

  • correct weak handling,

  • set a clear “data handling rule” for next actions.


2. Quick Classification

Tick one:

  • C-type: accidental leak by poor admin process (email forwarding, wrong CC, casual talk).

  • G-type: leak linked to neglect/weak controls (no access limits, no logs, unmanaged copies).

If threats, pressure, or extortion appear, move to conflict pathway (F).


3. Immediate Containment (Do Now)

  1. ☐ Stop sending more files until scope is known.

  2. ☐ Freeze the “latest package” version (no edits).

  3. ☐ Save evidence of leak (screenshots, emails, forwarded headers).

  4. ☐ Change access permissions (remove shared links, change passwords if used).

  5. ☐ Inform only the minimum internal leaders (need-to-know).


4. “Who Accessed” Mapping Form

A. What Was Leaked?

Tick all that apply:

  • ☐ Personal data (name/phone/address/ID)

  • ☐ Relic location / security details

  • ☐ Donor data (names/amounts)

  • ☐ Photos of relics / storage

  • ☐ Legal/complaint content

  • ☐ Evidence package documents

  • ☐ Other: ______________________

B. Where Did the Leak Happen?

  • ☐ Email (wrong recipient / CC / forward)

  • ☐ Messaging app (Line/WhatsApp/Viber/etc.)

  • ☐ Printed copies (left behind)

  • ☐ Shared drive / link

  • ☐ Meeting talk / verbal

  • ☐ External office handling

  • ☐ Unknown

C. Known or Possible Viewers (List)

Fill as a list. Use “Known” vs “Possible”.

Known viewers:

  1. __________________ (role/office)



Possible viewers:

  1. __________________ (how could they access?)



D. Access Timeline

  • First date/time leaked: //____ ______

  • Last confirmed access: //____ ______

  • Is the link/file still accessible? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

E. Evidence of Leak (Attach)

  • ☐ Email header / forwarding chain

  • ☐ Screenshot of shared message

  • ☐ Link audit / access list (if available)

  • ☐ Witness note (who saw what)


5. Impact Check (Simple)

Tick what impact is possible:

  • ☐ Privacy harm to people

  • ☐ Increased theft/security risk

  • ☐ Rumour/misinformation risk

  • ☐ Damage to trust with donors/community

  • ☐ Institutional reputation risk

  • ☐ Legal/regulatory risk

Risk level now: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High


6. Response Options (Choose What Fits)

Option A — Internal Correction Only (Low/Medium)

  • ☐ Notify internal team: “Do not resend. Use new rules.”

  • ☐ Replace file with redacted version for external use.

  • ☐ Update access permissions and logs.

Option B — External Containment Request (Medium/High)

Send a short, calm request to the office/person who received it:

Respectfully submitted,
We learned that a file/message may contain sensitive internal information.
For safety and privacy, we kindly request:

  1. Please do not forward or share it, and

  2. Please delete any extra copies if not required for official procedure.
    If you need the materials, we can provide a redacted version.
    With respect, …

Option C — Security Upgrade (High)

  • ☐ Move sensitive files to restricted storage

  • ☐ Two-person approval before sending

  • ☐ New code names for relic locations (internal only)

  • ☐ Review access list weekly for 30 days


7. DATA HANDLING RULE (HSWAGATA Minimum Standard)

Rule 1 — “Need-to-Know Only”

Share sensitive data only with:

  • the responsible office/unit, and

  • the named officer (if possible).

No broad distribution.

Rule 2 — “Copies First”

Send copies by default.
Originals only by in-person showing + receipt.

Rule 3 — “Redaction Default”

Before sending externally, remove:

  • personal phone numbers,

  • home addresses,

  • ID numbers,

  • exact relic storage location,
    unless it is strictly required.

Rule 4 — “One Package, One Owner”

Each evidence package must have:

  • one package code (TK030-…),

  • one sender,

  • one approved version.

No parallel versions.

Rule 5 — “No Open Links”

Do not use open public links.
If a link is required, use:

  • expiry date,

  • password,

  • access list.

Rule 6 — “Two-Person Review”

Any sensitive outgoing package must be reviewed by:

  • preparer + second reviewer.

Rule 7 — “Access Log”

Keep a simple log:

  • who had access,

  • when it was sent,

  • what version.

Rule 8 — “Speak Carefully”

Do not discuss sensitive details in public areas or casual chat.
Use short, procedural language only.

This reduces neglect-type loss and strengthens governance discipline.


8. Corrective Action Record (Fill-in)

Actions taken today:

  • ☐ Link removed / access closed

  • ☐ Redacted package prepared

  • ☐ External containment request sent

  • ☐ Internal instruction issued

  • ☐ Password changed / permissions updated

  • ☐ Other: ______________________

Responsible person: ______________________
Next review date: ____ / ____ / ______


9. Archive Checklist

Attach and file:

  • ☐ “Who accessed” mapping (Section 4)

  • ☐ Leak evidence (screenshots, headers)

  • ☐ Containment messages sent

  • ☐ New data handling rule acknowledgment (internal)

  • ☐ Updated access log

Archive tag: TK-030 / Sensitive info leak (C/G)


End of Template TK-030