Dhamma · Reflection · Statements · Peaceful Communication
Archive and publication page · Use Search, Topics, or the Month & Year archive to locate related materials.

Office Of Siridantamahapalaka: Template No.: T214 Template Title: Risk Assessment for Testing Proposal (Faith / Heritage / Peace)

Chronological Archive

Template No.: T214 Template Title: Risk Assessment for Testing Proposal (Faith / Heritage / Peace)

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: T214

Template Title: Risk Assessment for Testing Proposal (Faith / Heritage / Peace)

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science, Testing, Misinformation), Cases 46–65 (add F if conflict risk; add H for ethics model)

Linked Templates / Policies: Scientific Verification SOP, Relic Respect & Safeguarding Rules, T178 (In-Kind/Relics Intake), T212 (Visitor FAQ Planning), T213 (Media Interview Prep), T163 (Risk Register Entry), T190 (Media Approval), T173 (Records Classification)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:

Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):

New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


1) Purpose (why we use this form)

This form rates the risks of a testing proposal related to relics or sacred objects.
It checks faith risk, heritage risk, and peace risk, and records mitigation.


2) Testing proposal summary (proposal details)

  • Proposal title / reference: ________________________________________

  • Date received: ____ / ____ / ______

  • Requested by (person/organisation): ________________________________

  • Contact (optional): _______________________________________________

  • Reason for testing (tick): Care/conservation [ ] Education [ ] Authentication concern [ ] Rumour response [ ] Research [ ] Other: ____

Short description (2–4 lines):




3) Object / relic details (keep non-sensitive)

  • Item name / ID (museum reference): _________________________________

  • Item type (tick): Relic-related [ ] Sacred object [ ] Container/reliquary [ ] Material sample (already held) [ ] Other: ____

  • Current location (general): Display [ ] Storage [ ] Offsite (approved) [ ]

  • Current condition (tick): Good [ ] Fair [ ] Poor [ ] Unknown [ ]

Sensitivity warning: Do not write security routines, exact storage locations, or access methods here.


4) Proposed testing approach (high level only)

(Do not include “how-to” steps. Keep it general.)

  • Testing type (tick): Visual documentation only [ ] Non-destructive exam [ ] Material identification (non-destructive) [ ] Other: ____

  • Any sampling requested? Yes [ ] No [ ] Not sure [ ]
    If Yes/Not sure: this needs high-level approval. Mark Restricted/Sacred-Restricted.

  • Proposed testing location (tick): On-site [ ] External lab [ ] Not stated [ ]

  • Proposed external lab/institution (if any): ___________________________


5) Stakeholders and likely public attention

Tick who may be affected.

  • Monastic community [ ] Local lay community [ ] Donors [ ] Pilgrims [ ] Government/heritage office [ ] Media/public [ ] Other: ____

Public sensitivity level (tick): Low [ ] Medium [ ] High [ ]
Reason (short): _________________________________________________


6) Rating guide (use for the next sections)

Likelihood (chance): 1 Rare [ ] 2 Unlikely [ ] 3 Possible [ ] 4 Likely [ ] 5 Almost certain [ ]
Impact (harm level): 1 Minor [ ] 2 Low [ ] 3 Medium [ ] 4 High [ ] 5 Severe [ ]

Overall risk level (tick): Low [ ] Medium [ ] High [ ] Critical [ ]


7) Faith risk assessment (faith risk)

Faith risk means: risk of disrespect, loss of trust, wrong claims, or harm to sacred meaning.

A) Main faith risks (tick all that apply)

  • Community feels the act is disrespectful [ ]

  • Testing is seen as “doubt” in a harmful way [ ]

  • Testing language may insult beliefs [ ]

  • Results may be misunderstood or used to attack faith [ ]

  • Pressure from outside groups to “prove” things [ ]

  • Other: __________________________ [ ]

B) Likelihood and impact

  • Likelihood: 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ]

  • Impact: 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ]

C) Faith risk notes (facts only, short):


D) Required doctrinal/ethics check
Doctrinal/ethics advisor consulted? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Name/role/date: _________________________________________________


8) Heritage risk assessment (heritage risk)

Heritage risk means: risk of physical damage, loss, contamination, or breaking conservation rules.

A) Main heritage risks (tick all that apply)

  • Handling may damage the item [ ]

  • Transport risk (if moving offsite) [ ]

  • Environmental risk (heat, humidity, light) [ ]

  • Loss/theft risk increases [ ]

  • Testing may require sampling (damage risk) [ ]

  • Documentation/chain-of-custody is unclear [ ]

  • Other: __________________________ [ ]

B) Likelihood and impact

  • Likelihood: 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ]

  • Impact: 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ]

C) Heritage risk notes (short):


D) Conservation check
Conservation unit consulted? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Name/role/date: _________________________________________________


9) Peace and social harmony risk assessment (peace risk)

Peace risk means: risk of conflict, rumours, polarisation, or community division.

A) Main peace risks (tick all that apply)

  • Testing may trigger community conflict [ ]

  • Different groups may compete over “ownership” claims [ ]

  • Misinformation may spread online [ ]

  • Media may create sensational stories [ ]

  • Political use of results [ ]

  • Blame/shame between temples or families [ ]

  • Other: __________________________ [ ]

B) Likelihood and impact

  • Likelihood: 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ]

  • Impact: 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ]

C) Peace risk notes (short):


D) Conflict/security check
Conflict/Security unit consulted? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Name/role/date: _________________________________________________


10) Mitigation plan (mitigation)

List controls to reduce risks. Tick and add details.

A) Faith risk mitigations

  • Use respectful wording and explain limits [ ]

  • Consult monastic/ethics advisor before action [ ]

  • Prepare a calm public explanation (if needed) [ ]

  • Avoid public “prove/disprove” language [ ]
    Notes: ____________________________________________________________

B) Heritage risk mitigations

  • Use minimal handling and proper supports [ ]

  • Keep item on-site if possible [ ]

  • If transport: use secure chain-of-custody and approved packing [ ]

  • Limit access to authorised staff only [ ]

  • No sampling unless top approval [ ]
    Notes: ____________________________________________________________

C) Peace risk mitigations

  • Stakeholder briefing (elders/temple leaders) before any action [ ]

  • Media plan and “red lines” prepared (T213) [ ]

  • Monitor rumours and respond calmly with facts [ ]

  • Keep results contextual and avoid blame [ ]
    Notes: ____________________________________________________________

D) Communication control (tick)

  • Internal only updates until approval [ ]

  • Public statement needed? Yes [ ] No [ ]
    If Yes: use T190 approval [ ] and link to T212 FAQ [ ]


11) Overall decision (approve / hold / refuse)

Decision (tick one):
Approve to proceed (with mitigations) [ ]
Approve only after changes (list below) [ ]
Hold for more information [ ]
Do not proceed / refuse testing proposal [ ]

Key reasons (short):


Conditions required (if approved)




If held: information needed

  • Documents needed: _______________________________________________

  • Who will provide: ______________________ By date: //____


12) Risk register and follow-up

Risk register entry needed (T163)? Yes [ ] No [ ]
If Yes, Risk ID: _______________________________

Follow-up review date: ____ / ____ / ______
Owner (name/role): _______________________________________________


13) Signatures and approvals

Prepared by (name/role): _______________________ Signature: __________ Date: //____

Reviewed by (Science/Verification): _____________ Signature: __________ Date: //____

Reviewed by (Conservation): ____________________ Signature: __________ Date: //____

Reviewed by (Doctrinal/Ethics): ________________ Signature: __________ Date: //____

Reviewed by (Security/Conflict): ________________ Signature: __________ Date: //____

Approved by (Director/Authority/Board): _________ Signature: __________ Date: //____


14) Attachments and filing

Attachments (tick):
Proposal document [ ] Photos/ID record [ ] Condition report [ ] Lab credentials [ ] Draft public message [ ] Other: ____

File code / reference ID: ____________________
Classification recommended (T173): Internal [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted [ ]
File location (cabinet/folder + digital path): __________________________