Dhamma · Reflection · Statements · Peaceful Communication

Office Of Siridantamahapalaka

Chronological Archive

TK-058 (E/H) Template Title: Research Paper Request with Sacred Limits — Data Request & Sacred-Restricted Release Form

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-058 (E/H)

Template Title: Research Paper Request with Sacred Limits — Data Request & Sacred-Restricted Release Form

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster H (Normative Models / Best Practice)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-050 Testing Results Leaked Early — Confidentiality Control

  • TK-052 Replica / 3D Scan Ethics Policy (if digital outputs requested)

  • TK-056 Right-Speech Communications Guide

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [✔ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-058 — Purpose

Use this form when a researcher asks for data, photos, test results, or documents for a paper, thesis, report, or conference, but the material has sacred limits or security risks.

This form helps HSWAGATA:

  • protect relic safety and faith,

  • share education safely,

  • prevent leaks and misuse,

  • set clear conditions for research use.


A. Research Request Intake

  1. Date received: ____ / ____ / ______

  2. Request received by (name/role): __________________________________

  3. Researcher name: ______________________________________________

  4. Institution / department: ________________________________________

  5. Country: ____________________

  6. Email / phone: ________________________________________________

  7. Research type (tick):
    ☐ Journal paper ☐ Thesis/dissertation ☐ Conference ☐ Museum report ☐ Documentary script ☐ Other: _______

  8. Topic/title (as stated by requester):


  1. Deadline requested: _______________________________


B. Requested Materials (Data Request List)

Tick what the researcher is asking for:

B1. Text/data

  • ☐ Lab report / scientific results

  • ☐ Conservation condition report

  • ☐ Chain-of-custody records

  • ☐ Donor/provenance documents

  • ☐ Meeting minutes / internal notes

  • ☐ Policies / SOPs

  • ☐ Other: __________________________

B2. Images/media

  • ☐ High-resolution relic photos

  • ☐ Close-up or macro images

  • ☐ Exhibition images

  • ☐ Video footage

  • ☐ 3D scan / digital model

  • ☐ Other: __________________________

B3. Personal / sensitive

  • ☐ Names of donors/custodians

  • ☐ Contact details

  • ☐ Location/security details

  • ☐ Sacred narratives not public

  • ☐ Other: __________________________


C. Sacred-Restricted Classification (HSWAGATA Use)

For each requested item, mark the level:

ItemPublicInternalRestrictedSacred-Restricted
1) __________________
2) __________________
3) __________________

Default rule: If unsure, classify as Restricted or Sacred-Restricted.

Reviewer name/role: __________________________ Date: //____


D. Sacred-Restricted Release Rules (Core Rules)

HSWAGATA may release material only if:

  1. Purpose is clear (education/academic use, not trade, not fundraising “proof”).

  2. Minimum necessary release (share the least amount needed).

  3. No security risk (no exact storage location, no access methods).

  4. No harm to faith/community (no mocking, no sensational claims).

  5. No “proof” language required by the researcher.

  6. Written agreement signed (this form + conditions).

  7. Right to refuse remains with HSWAGATA.


E. Decision (Choose One)

  • ☐ Approved (public materials only)

  • ☐ Approved (limited restricted release with conditions)

  • ☐ Approved (sacred-restricted excerpt only; heavy redaction)

  • ☐ Paused (need more info / ethics review)

  • ☐ Rejected (risk too high)

Reason (short):


Decision by: __________________ Role: ______________ Date: //____
Board / delegated approval required? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes: Approved by: __________________ Date: //____


F. Sacred-Restricted Release Form (Agreement)

F1. What HSWAGATA will release

List exactly what will be provided (include version/date):




Format: ☐ PDF ☐ Print copy ☐ On-site viewing only ☐ Watermarked images ☐ Other: _______

F2. What will NOT be released

Tick all that apply:

  • ☐ Exact relic storage location/security details

  • ☐ Full chain-of-custody logs

  • ☐ Donor identities (unless written consent exists)

  • ☐ Raw lab data files

  • ☐ High-resolution close-ups that increase theft/fraud risk

  • ☐ Sacred narratives not meant for public

  • ☐ Any content that can be used as “proof” for fundraising/trade

F3. Conditions of use (Researcher must agree)

Tick to agree:

  • ☐ Use is for academic/educational purpose only.

  • ☐ No resale, no commercial licensing, no fundraising use.

  • ☐ No claim of “HSWAGATA confirms authenticity.”

  • ☐ No editing that changes meaning (no misleading cropping/caption).

  • ☐ Proper citation of HSWAGATA as source (as given by museum).

  • ☐ Draft must be shared with HSWAGATA for factual check before publication (optional but preferred).

  • ☐ Researcher will protect files (no public sharing of originals).

  • ☐ If a leak occurs, researcher will inform HSWAGATA within 24 hours.

  • ☐ HSWAGATA may withdraw permission if terms are broken.

F4. Required disclaimer text (must appear in paper/appendix)

“This material was shared with limits to protect sacred heritage and safety. It does not function as final proof of authenticity. Scientific methods have limits, and religious meaning is not only a lab matter.”


G. Redaction & Watermark Checklist (HSWAGATA Use)

Before release, tick:

  • ☐ Names removed or coded

  • ☐ Locations removed (no maps, no storage details)

  • ☐ Metadata cleaned where needed

  • ☐ Watermark added: “Restricted / For Research Use Only / Do Not Share”

  • ☐ File version code assigned: _____________________

  • ☐ Access log recorded (who sent it, to whom, when)


H. Signatures

H1. Researcher Declaration

I agree to follow the conditions above and respect sacred limits.

Researcher name: __________________________
Signature: _______________________________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

H2. HSWAGATA Approval

Approved by (name/role): __________________________
Signature: _______________________________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Witness (mandatory): _______________________ Signature: __________ Date: //____


I. Archive

Archive code / file location: ______________________________________
Status: ☐ Active ☐ Closed ☐ Monitoring (publication pending)

End of Template TK-058



TK-057 (D/E) Template Title: Donor Demands “Test It My Way” — Donor Messages & Donor Boundary Policy

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-057 (D/E)

Template Title: Donor Demands “Test It My Way” — Donor Messages & Donor Boundary Policy

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster D (Everyday Faith & Lay Donations) + Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-043 Consent-First Testing Rule

  • TK-044 Non-Invasive-First Policy

  • TK-046 Lab Method Misunderstood — Public FAQ Sheet

  • TK-047 De-escalation Script

  • TK-051 No-Fast-Claims Policy

  • TK-056 Right-Speech Communications Guide

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-057 — Purpose

Use this template when a donor or lay supporter:

  • demands a specific test, lab, or method (“test it my way”),

  • links donation, gifts, or support to testing demands,

  • pressures staff emotionally or spiritually (“I gave money, so you must test”),

  • insists on invasive or harmful testing,

  • threatens to withdraw support or create public trouble if refused.

This template protects:

  • relic safety,

  • staff boundaries, and

  • ethical donor relationships.


A. Donor Request Intake

  1. Date received: ____ / ____ / ______

  2. Received by (name/role): ____________________________________

  3. Donor name (if known): _____________________________________

  4. Donor type:
    ☐ Individual ☐ Family ☐ Group ☐ Foundation ☐ Anonymous supporter

  5. Channel of request (tick):
    ☐ In person ☐ Phone ☐ Email ☐ Message app ☐ Letter ☐ Through monk/agent

  6. Exact donor demand (quote if possible):



  1. What test or action is demanded?
    ☐ DNA ☐ Carbon-14 ☐ Specific lab ☐ Invasive sampling
    ☐ Fast public declaration ☐ Media announcement
    ☐ Other: ___________________________

  2. Is the demand linked to donation or support?
    ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unclear
    If yes, explain briefly: _______________________________________

Initial risk level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
Assigned officer: _____________________ Date: //____


B. Donor Boundary Policy (Core Policy)

Policy rule: Donations do not buy control over relics, testing, wording, or decisions.

HSWAGATA:

  • welcomes faith and generosity,

  • but does not accept testing instructions from donors,

  • does not exchange money for proof, testing, or public claims.

All testing decisions follow:

  1. Consent-first,

  2. Non-invasive-first,

  3. Board-approved ethics, and

  4. Relic safety before curiosity.


C. Immediate Staff Response (What to Do First)

Tick what was done:

  • ☐ Listened calmly and respectfully

  • ☐ Did not promise testing or outcomes

  • ☐ Used safe wording (Right Speech guide)

  • ☐ Explained boundary clearly

  • ☐ Recorded request using this template

  • ☐ Escalated to supervisor if pressure continued

Notes (short):



D. Reality Check (Internal Use)

Tick what is already in place:

D1. Custody and consent

  • ☐ Legal/recognized custodian identified

  • ☐ Donor is not the custodian (most cases)

  • ☐ No consent exists for requested test

  • ☐ Requested test violates non-invasive-first policy

D2. Ethics and risk

  • ☐ High physical risk to relic

  • ☐ High misinformation risk

  • ☐ High conflict risk

  • ☐ High staff safety risk

If any high-risk box is ticked → do not negotiate testing.


E. Standard Boundary Response Scripts (Choose One)

Staff may read or send one of these. Do not improvise.

E1. Calm boundary statement

“Thank you for your devotion and support. HSWAGATA cannot accept instructions on testing. All decisions follow consent-first and non-invasive-first policies to protect the relic.”

E2. Donation-linked pressure response

“We respect generosity, but donations do not decide testing or public claims. We must follow ethical and safety rules for everyone.”

E3. Invasive testing refusal

“We cannot approve that method because it may harm the relic. We will not damage sacred objects, even with good intentions.”

E4. Escalation pause

“This request needs formal review. We will respond through our official process. We cannot continue this discussion right now.”

(Used option): ☐ E1 ☐ E2 ☐ E3 ☐ E4
Delivered by: _____________________ Date: //____
Delivery method: ☐ Spoken ☐ Email ☐ Letter


F. If Donor Continues to Pressure

Tick all that apply:

  • ☐ Repeat boundary once (do not debate)

  • ☐ End conversation politely

  • ☐ Refer to senior officer only

  • ☐ Record all messages and calls

  • ☐ Use de-escalation script if emotional

  • ☐ Escalate to Compliance/Board if threats or money pressure continue

Notes:



G. Donor Relationship Outcome

Choose one:

  • ☐ Donor accepted boundary

  • ☐ Donor unhappy but calm

  • ☐ Donor withdrew support

  • ☐ Donor threatened public action

  • ☐ Ongoing monitoring required

Next step (if any): ___________________________________________


H. Ethical Reminder (Internal)

A donor’s faith is respected.
A donor’s money is respected.
The relic is not for sale, negotiation, or proof-making.


I. Sign-off & Archive

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Head/Compliance): __________________ Signature: ________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______
Archive code / file location: ______________________________________

End of Template TK-057



TK-056 (E/C) Template Title: Staff Unsure What They Can Say — Staff Interviews & Right-Speech Communications Guide

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-056 (E/C)

Template Title: Staff Unsure What They Can Say — Staff Interviews & Right-Speech Communications Guide

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster C (Institutional Responsibility & Governance)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-045 Public Science Claim Pre-Release Review

  • TK-046 Lab Method Misunderstood — Public FAQ Sheet

  • TK-047 De-escalation Script for Angry Situations

  • TK-050 Confidentiality Control (Leaks)

  • TK-051 No-Fast-Claims Policy

  • TK-055 Social Media Impersonation SOP

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [✔ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-056 — Purpose

Use this template when:

  • staff feel afraid, confused, or silent because they are unsure what to say,

  • different staff give different answers to the public,

  • staff interviews, tours, or casual conversations create risk,

  • science, testing, miracles, or authenticity topics arise.

This template has two parts:

  1. Staff interview & confusion mapping, and

  2. a Right-Speech Communications Guide (what staff can say, must not say, and how to respond).


A. Staff Interview & Confusion Record

(Use with individual staff or small groups. This is not disciplinary.)

A1. Interview details

  • Date: ____ / ____ / ______

  • Interviewer (name/role): __________________________

  • Staff role interviewed:
    ☐ Front desk ☐ Guide ☐ Security ☐ Admin ☐ Conservator ☐ Volunteer ☐ Other: _______

A2. Main areas of uncertainty (tick all that apply)

  • ☐ Testing methods (DNA, Carbon-14, labs)

  • ☐ Authenticity questions

  • ☐ “Miracle” stories

  • ☐ Media questions

  • ☐ Donor pressure

  • ☐ Social media comments

  • ☐ Confidential information

  • ☐ Conflict between groups

A3. Exact staff concerns (write in their words)



A4. Situations where staff felt unsafe or unsure




B. Core Principle — Right Speech (Operational Meaning)

At HSWAGATA, Right Speech means:

  • speak truthfully,

  • speak calmly,

  • speak with care,

  • speak within your role,

  • and do not cause harm.

Staff are not required to answer everything.
Silence, pause, or referral is often the correct action.


C. What Staff ARE Allowed to Say (Safe Speech)

Staff may always say:

C1. About relics and authenticity

  • “HSWAGATA protects relics with care and respect.”

  • “We do not make fast authenticity claims.”

  • “Any public statement is shared through official channels.”

C2. About science and testing

  • “Some methods have limits.”

  • “Some results can be inconclusive.”

  • “We follow consent-first and non-invasive-first policies.”

C3. About rumours or online claims

  • “I cannot confirm that.”

  • “Please check our official website or ask the office.”

  • “We record concerns and review them carefully.”

C4. About your own role

  • “I am not authorised to speak on that detail.”

  • “I will pass your question to the right department.”


D. What Staff MUST NOT Say (Unsafe Speech)

Staff must never say:

  • “Science proved it is 100% authentic.”

  • “This lab confirmed it is Buddha’s tooth.”

  • “I personally believe it is real / fake.”

  • “We will test it soon / secretly / quickly.”

  • “The other group is lying / bad / corrupt.”

  • Any statement based on gossip, pressure, or personal opinion.


E. The 5-Line Safe Response Script (Memorise This)

When unsure, staff may use any 2–3 lines:

  1. “Thank you for your question.”

  2. “This topic needs careful wording.”

  3. “I am not authorised to give details.”

  4. “HSWAGATA shares verified information through official channels.”

  5. “I can help you contact the office for a formal reply.”


F. Special Situations

F1. Media or YouTuber

  • “Please contact our official spokesperson.”

  • Do not answer on camera without approval.

F2. Angry visitor

  • Use calm tone.

  • Use TK-047 de-escalation lines.

  • Step away if voices rise.

F3. Donor pressure

  • “We cannot change our words for money.”

  • Record the request using the proper template.

F4. Social media comments

  • Staff must not reply from personal accounts.

  • Report to Communications unit.


G. Training Actions (Office Use)

Tick what will be done:

  • ☐ Staff briefing (15–30 minutes)

  • ☐ Distribute this guide (print or digital)

  • ☐ Role-play difficult questions

  • ☐ Update Approved Wording List

  • ☐ Assign one contact person per shift

Training date planned: ____ / ____ / ______
Trainer / lead: ___________________________


H. Staff Acknowledgement (Optional)

I understand that I am not expected to answer everything, and that using safe wording protects myself, the relics, and the institution.

Staff name: __________________________
Signature: ___________________________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______


I. Closure & Archive

Status: ☐ Active ☐ Updated ☐ Archived
Archive code / file location: ______________________________________


Sign-off

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Head/Compliance): __________________ Signature: ________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

End of Template TK-056



TK-055 (E/F) Template Title: Social Media Impersonation — Account Reports & Impersonation Response SOP

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-055 (E/F)

Template Title: Social Media Impersonation — Account Reports & Impersonation Response SOP

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster F (Conflicts / HGT Disputes)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-042 Lay Complaint & Rumour Intake Record

  • TK-047 “Inconclusive” Result Anger — De-escalation Script

  • TK-050 Testing Results Leaked Early — Confidentiality Control

  • TK-051 No-Fast-Claims Policy

  • TK-054 Website Page Used to Spread False Claim — Web Controls

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-055 — Purpose

Use this template when a fake or impersonating social media account:

  • uses the name “HSWAGATA,” museum logos, staff names, or relic images,

  • spreads false claims (authenticity, testing, miracles, donations),

  • contacts donors, monks, or the public pretending to be HSWAGATA,

  • creates conflict, anger, or pressure.

This template provides:

  1. an incident record,

  2. account reporting steps, and

  3. a clear Impersonation Response SOP.


A. Impersonation Incident Intake

  1. Date discovered: ____ / ____ / ______ ________

  2. Discovered by (name/role): __________________________________

  3. Platform (tick):
    ☐ Facebook ☐ Instagram ☐ X / Twitter ☐ YouTube ☐ TikTok
    ☐ Telegram ☐ Line ☐ WhatsApp ☐ Website ☐ Other: __________

  4. Account name / handle (exact): _______________________________

  5. Account URL (record internally): ______________________________

  6. Profile uses (tick all that apply):
    ☐ Museum name ☐ Logo ☐ Relic images ☐ Staff name/photo
    ☐ “Official” wording ☐ Donation request ☐ Testing claim ☐ Miracle claim

  7. First known post date: ____ / ____ / ______

  8. Current risk level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
    (High if money requests, threats, or rapid spread)

Assigned officer: ____________________ Date: //____


B. Evidence Collection (Do Before Reporting)

Tick when complete:

  • ☐ Screenshot profile page (name, handle, photo, bio)

  • ☐ Screenshot false posts/messages (with date/time)

  • ☐ Screenshot follower count / engagement

  • ☐ Copy post URLs and message text

  • ☐ Save evidence in secure folder (do not edit)

Evidence storage location / code: _______________________________


C. Impact Check

Tick all that apply:

  • ☐ Public confusion

  • ☐ Donors contacted

  • ☐ Money requested or received

  • ☐ Threats or harassment

  • ☐ Media picked up false account

  • ☐ Conflict between groups

  • ☐ Use of fake certificates / lab claims

Notes:



D. Impersonation Response SOP (Step-by-Step)

Step 1 — Internal Confirmation

  • ☐ Confirm the account is not official

  • ☐ Check official account list (HSWAGATA verified pages)

  • ☐ Inform Communications + Compliance leads

Step 2 — Platform Report (Immediate)

Report using the platform’s impersonation / fake account option.

Tick when submitted:

  • ☐ Platform impersonation report sent

  • ☐ Evidence uploaded

  • ☐ Official account linked as the real one

  • ☐ Case/reference number recorded (if given): ___________

Step 3 — Public Safety Notice (If Needed)

Choose one:

  • ☐ No public notice (low reach, removed quickly)

  • ☐ Short warning on official channels

  • ☐ Direct message to affected donors / monks

Safe warning wording (copy-paste):

“There is a fake account pretending to be HSWAGATA. It is not managed by the museum. Please do not send money or trust claims from unofficial accounts. Verified information is shared only through our official channels.”

Step 4 — Protect People and Relics

  • ☐ Remind staff: never reply from personal accounts

  • ☐ Remind public: no donations via social media messages

  • ☐ Monitor comments for escalation or threats

  • ☐ Escalate to Security/Legal if fraud suspected


E. Platform-Specific Notes (Optional)

Platform: ______________________
Any special steps taken (blue check, trademark form, etc.):



F. Follow-Up Monitoring

Tick what will be done:

  • ☐ Daily check for reappearance (7 days)

  • ☐ Search for copy accounts / similar names

  • ☐ Monitor hashtags and shared images

  • ☐ Update donor/community list if needed

Assigned to: ____________________ Until: //____


G. Closure

Outcome:

  • ☐ Account removed

  • ☐ Account restricted / labelled fake

  • ☐ Still active (monitoring)

  • ☐ Escalated to legal authorities

Final notes (2–4 lines):



Archive code / file location: ______________________________________


H. Sign-off

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Comms/Compliance/Security): ______________ Signature: ____
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

End of Template TK-055



TK-054 (E/C) Template Title: Website Page Used to Spread False Claim — Web Logs & Web Publishing Controls

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-054 (E/C)

Template Title: Website Page Used to Spread False Claim — Web Logs & Web Publishing Controls

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster C (Institution-Building / Responsibility & MoUs)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-042 Lay Complaint & Rumour Intake Record

  • TK-045 Public Science Claim Pre-Release Review

  • TK-050 Testing Results Leaked Early — Confidentiality Control

  • TK-051 No-Fast-Claims Policy

  • TK-055 “Science Talk” Misuse Risk Assessment

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-054 — Purpose

Use this template when a HSWAGATA website page (or a partner site page) is used to spread:

  • a false claim about testing, authenticity, approvals, or “proof,” or

  • misleading lab language, edited images, or fake documents.

This template helps staff:

  1. contain harm quickly,

  2. collect web logs and evidence,

  3. correct or remove the content safely, and

  4. strengthen web publishing controls.


A. Incident Intake (What Happened)

  1. Page URL / web address (record internally): ____________________________

  2. Page title (as shown): _____________________________________________

  3. Date/time discovered: ____ / ____ / ______ ________

  4. Discovered by (name/role): _________________________________________

  5. Source of report: ☐ Visitor ☐ Donor ☐ Staff ☐ Media ☐ Other: ___________

  6. False claim type (tick all that apply)

  • ☐ “Scientifically proven authentic”

  • ☐ “Lab confirmed Buddha tooth relic”

  • ☐ “DNA / Carbon-14 confirms”

  • ☐ “Official government / palace letter confirms”

  • ☐ Edited image used as proof

  • ☐ Fake certificate / fake stamp / fake logo

  • ☐ Other: ______________________________________________

  1. Exact false wording (copy exact sentence):



Risk level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
(High if fundraising, conflict, threats, or major media spread)

Assigned lead officer: ____________________ Date: //____


B. Immediate Containment (Do First)

Tick what is done now:

  • ☐ Take screenshots of the page (top, claim text, images, footer, date)

  • ☐ Save page as PDF (internal evidence)

  • ☐ Record URL + time + browser used

  • ☐ Turn page to “draft/unpublished” OR add emergency banner note

  • ☐ Stop sharing (remove from homepage / remove from social links)

  • ☐ Notify Compliance & Risk + Executive lead

  • ☐ If fundraising involved: notify Finance/Donations unit

Containment notes (short):



C. Web Log & Change Evidence Collection

C1. Server / CMS logs to collect (tick)

  • ☐ CMS edit history (who edited, what changed, when)

  • ☐ Login logins (admin/editor access list)

  • ☐ IP addresses (if available)

  • ☐ Publish/unpublish log

  • ☐ File upload log (images/PDFs)

  • ☐ Web access logs (traffic spikes)

C2. Key details to record

  • CMS platform: ☐ WordPress ☐ Wix ☐ Squarespace ☐ Custom ☐ Other: ________

  • Page ID / post ID (if available): _________________________________

  • Last modified date shown in CMS: ____ / ____ / ______

  • Who last edited (username): _________________________________

  • Any unknown login? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unclear
    Notes: ________________________________________________________

C3. Attachments on the page

List all files/images used for the claim:

  1. File name/URL: __________________________ Type: ☐ Image ☐ PDF ☐ Video

  2. File name/URL: __________________________ Type: ☐ Image ☐ PDF ☐ Video
    (Continue if needed)


D. Root Cause Check (Do Not Blame Without Evidence)

Select likely cause(s):

  • ☐ Staff mistake (draft published too early)

  • ☐ Poor review controls (no approval step)

  • ☐ Unauthorized editor access (shared password)

  • ☐ Account compromise / hacking suspected

  • ☐ External partner supplied false text/images

  • ☐ Old content reused without update

  • ☐ Other: _______________________

Evidence (facts only):




E. Correction Action (Choose One Main Path)

E1. Remove

  • ☐ Page removed/unpublished
    Reason: _____________________________________________

E2. Correct

  • ☐ Page corrected with approved wording

  • ☐ Misleading text deleted

  • ☐ Images replaced/labelled “Illustration / Not proof”

  • ☐ Add date-stamped correction note at top

E3. Replace with a safe official statement

  • ☐ Replace page with short official clarification (no details that fuel drama)
    Suggested safe statement:
    “An earlier version of this page contained incorrect or unclear wording. HSWAGATA does not make fast authenticity claims and does not treat partial materials as proof. Verified information is shared only through official channels.”

Action completed by: ____________________ Date: //____


F. Web Publishing Controls (Mandatory Controls Checklist)

Implement and tick when done:

F1. Roles and permissions

  • ☐ Separate roles: Admin / Editor / Author

  • ☐ Remove unused accounts

  • ☐ No shared accounts

  • ☐ Strong passwords + password manager

  • ☐ Two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled for admin/editor

F2. Publishing workflow

  • ☐ Draft → Review → Approval → Publish (no direct publish)

  • ☐ Two-person rule for pages that mention “science/testing/authenticity”

  • ☐ Required use of TK-045 (pre-release review) before publishing claims

  • ☐ “Approved wording list” used (safe phrases only)

F3. Technical controls

  • ☐ Auto backups enabled (daily/weekly)

  • ☐ Change log retained for ___ months

  • ☐ Security plugin/firewall enabled (if possible)

  • ☐ Limit file uploads to approved types

  • ☐ Watermark/label policy for relic images

F4. Monitoring

  • ☐ Weekly check of high-risk pages

  • ☐ Alerts for login from new device/location

  • ☐ Alerts for sudden traffic spikes

  • ☐ Monitor for copied pages or screenshots spreading elsewhere

Assigned to (name/role): __________________ Due date: //____


G. Public Communication (If Needed)

Choose:

  • ☐ No public response (quiet fix)

  • ☐ Short correction notice on site only

  • ☐ Social media correction (official channel only)

  • ☐ Direct message to key stakeholders (donors, monks, partners)

Spokesperson: ____________________ Date: //____
Final approved wording stored at: __________________________


H. Closure & Archive

Status: ☐ Open ☐ Monitoring ☐ Closed
Final summary (2–4 lines):



Archive code / file location: ______________________________________


I. Sign-off

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Compliance/IT Lead): __________________ Signature: ______
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

End of Template TK-054

TK-053 (E/G) Template Title: “Miracle” Claim from Environmental Effect — Climate Logs & Conservation Explanation Note

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-053 (E/G)

Template Title: “Miracle” Claim from Environmental Effect — Climate Logs & Conservation Explanation Note

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster G (Neglect & Relic Loss Prevention)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-042 Lay Complaint & Rumour Intake Record

  • TK-044 Sampling Risk & Non-Invasive-First Policy

  • TK-046 Lab Method Misunderstood — Public FAQ Sheet

  • TK-047 “Inconclusive” Result Anger — De-escalation Script

  • TK-050 Testing Results Leaked Early — Confidentiality Control

  • TK-060 Visual Integrity Review (if photos are used as proof)

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-053 — Purpose

Use this template when someone claims a “miracle” based on environment effects, such as:

  • sudden droplets, mist, sweat-like moisture on the relic or case

  • unusual smell, fogging, condensation, colour change

  • “light,” “glow,” “smoke,” “heat,” or “coolness” reports

  • mould, dust, salt crystals, or surface change seen as sacred sign

This template helps staff:

  1. record the claim respectfully,

  2. check climate logs (humidity, temperature, light),

  3. protect the relic (conservation first), and

  4. prepare a calm Conservation Explanation Note (for public or donors).


A. Intake Record (Respectful, Neutral)

  1. Date/time of report: ____ / ____ / ______ ________

  2. Reported by: _____________________ Role: ☐ Visitor ☐ Donor ☐ Staff ☐ Monk ☐ Other: ______

  3. Location (room/case ID): _______________________________________

  4. What was observed? (tick all that apply)
    ☐ Condensation / droplets ☐ Fogging glass ☐ Moisture smell
    ☐ Sudden warmth ☐ Sudden coolness ☐ “Glow/light” claim
    ☐ Surface change (colour/texture) ☐ Mould/dust/crystals
    ☐ Other: __________________________

  5. Exact words used (if possible):



  1. Any photos/videos presented as proof? ☐ Yes ☐ No
    If yes, store and cross-reference TK-060.

Initial risk level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
(High if relic safety risk, crowd pressure, or media spread)

Assigned officer: _____________________ Date: //____


B. Immediate Relic Protection (Do First)

Tick what was done:

  • ☐ Calmly restrict touching / crowding

  • ☐ Keep relic case closed (do not open for “proof”)

  • ☐ Notify conservator / maintenance lead

  • ☐ Take condition photos (internal only)

  • ☐ Check seals and locks

  • ☐ Start “environment check” within 30 minutes if possible

Notes: _________________________________________________________


C. Climate Log Capture (Environmental Check)

C1. Time window to review
From //_____ ______ to //_____ ______

C2. Data sources (tick)

  • ☐ Digital humidity sensor

  • ☐ Temperature sensor

  • ☐ Light (lux/UV) record

  • ☐ Aircon/dehumidifier logs

  • ☐ Visitor count / door-open frequency

  • ☐ Weather note (rain season / cold/hot day)

  • ☐ Power outage / system failure record

  • ☐ Other: __________________________

C3. Key readings (record numbers if available)

  • Humidity (RH%): Min ____ Max ____ Average ____

  • Temperature (°C): Min ____ Max ____ Average ____

  • Light/UV note (if any): ______________________________________

  • Any sudden changes? ☐ Yes ☐ No
    If yes, describe: _______________________________________________

C4. Events that can cause “miracle-like” effects (tick)

  • ☐ Aircon turned off/on

  • ☐ Door opened many times

  • ☐ Crowd heat and breath near glass

  • ☐ Rainy weather / high humidity outside

  • ☐ Cold glass + warm air (condensation)

  • ☐ Cleaning chemical / perfume in room

  • ☐ Water leak or nearby plant watering

  • ☐ New lighting installed / reflection effect


D. Conservator / Maintenance Note (Required if object risk)

  1. Conservator/maintenance reviewer: ______________________________

  2. Date/time reviewed: ____ / ____ / ______ ________

  3. Observed physical risk (tick):
    ☐ No risk seen
    ☐ Moisture risk (condensation)
    ☐ Mould risk
    ☐ Corrosion / salt crystals risk
    ☐ Dust/air quality risk
    ☐ Cracking/flaking risk

  4. Immediate actions recommended:


  1. Long-term actions recommended:



E. Conservation Explanation Note (Public-Safe Text)

Use this note when needed. Keep calm. Do not deny faith. Do not mock.

E1. Short version (for visitors)

“Thank you for sharing what you saw. Sometimes changes in temperature and humidity can create fog, droplets, or reflections on glass. We will check our climate records and protect the relic carefully. HSWAGATA will share verified information through official channels.”

E2. Longer version (for donors / community leaders)

“HSWAGATA respects people’s feelings and faith. At the same time, the museum must protect sacred relics from harm. Some ‘miracle-like’ signs can happen because of natural conditions, such as high humidity, rain season, warm breath from a crowd, cold glass, or sudden aircon changes. These can cause condensation, smells, or changes on surfaces.
We check climate logs (humidity and temperature) and we follow conservation care. We do not open cases or handle relics for public proof. Our goal is peace, safety, and respectful education.”

E3. Key safe sentence (must include in any written statement)

“This explanation is about conservation conditions. It is not a judgment on personal faith experiences.”


F. Decision & Follow-up

  1. Was the cause likely environmental?
    ☐ Likely yes ☐ Unclear ☐ No (needs more review)

  2. Actions taken (tick)

  • ☐ Adjust humidity control

  • ☐ Add door/visitor management

  • ☐ Add sign: “Please keep distance from glass”

  • ☐ Improve sensor placement

  • ☐ Staff briefing on calm response

  • ☐ Public FAQ update (if confusion spreads)

Assigned to: ______________________ Due date: //____


G. Closure

Status: ☐ Open ☐ Monitoring ☐ Closed
Final summary (2–4 lines):



Archive code / file location: ______________________________________


H. Sign-off

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Conservator/Head): __________________ Signature: _______
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

End of Template TK-053

TK-052 (E/H) Template Title: Replica / 3D Scan Request — Proposal Review & Replica Ethics Policy

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-052 (E/H)

Template Title: Replica / 3D Scan Request — Proposal Review & Replica Ethics Policy

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster H (Normative Models / Best Practice)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-043 Consent-First Testing Rule

  • TK-044 Non-Invasive-First Policy (Sampling risk)

  • TK-049 External Expert COI Disclosure Form

  • TK-050 Confidentiality Control (leaks)

  • TK-051 No-Fast-Claims Policy

  • TK-060 Image Editing & Visual Integrity Review

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

  • From Casebook to Compass (normative + governance templates)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-052 — Purpose

Use this template when a person or institution requests:

  • a replica, 3D scan, 3D model, digital twin, mould, or copy of a relic or relic container,

  • for display, education, research, media, or commercial purposes.

This template includes:

  1. a proposal intake form, and

  2. a Replica Ethics Policy (HSWAGATA rules).


A. Proposal Intake (Request Details)

  1. Request title (short): __________________________________________

  2. Date received: ____ / ____ / ______

  3. Requester type (tick):
    ☐ Museum ☐ University ☐ Lab ☐ Media ☐ Donor ☐ Temple group ☐ Private company ☐ Individual ☐ Other: _______

  4. Requester name / organisation: __________________________________

  5. Contact person + role: _________________________________________

  6. Contact details: _______________________________________________

  7. What is requested? (tick all that apply)

  • ☐ 3D scan (non-contact)

  • ☐ Photogrammetry (many photos)

  • ☐ CT / X-ray scanning

  • ☐ Surface scan (laser/structured light)

  • ☐ Physical mould/cast (contact)

  • ☐ 3D printed replica

  • ☐ Digital model for online use

  • ☐ Other: __________________________

  1. Purpose stated by requester (tick):

  • ☐ Education

  • ☐ Conservation planning

  • ☐ Research publication

  • ☐ Exhibition display

  • ☐ Virtual museum / website

  • ☐ Commercial product / sales

  • ☐ Religious outreach

  • ☐ Other: __________________________

  1. Deadline requested: ______________________

Assigned officer: _____________________ Date: //____


B. Replica Ethics Policy (Core Policy)

B1. Core rule

HSWAGATA may allow replicas or scans only when they:

  • protect the relic from harm,

  • reduce conflict and misinformation,

  • support peace, education, and respectful understanding.

HSWAGATA does not allow replicas or scans that:

  • create confusion about “authenticity,”

  • support fraud, relic trade, or fundraising deception,

  • disrespect sacred objects,

  • increase theft risk,

  • or break consent and custody rules.

B2. Consent-first rule

No scan, model, or replica work starts without:

  • written consent from the authorised custodian, and

  • Board (or delegated) approval.

B3. Non-invasive-first rule

HSWAGATA prefers methods that do not touch the relic:

  • allowed first: photography, photogrammetry, non-contact scanning

  • normally not allowed: moulds, casts, rubbing, any surface scraping

B4. “No new proof claims” rule

Replicas and 3D models must never be described as:

  • “scientific proof,” “DNA proof,” “authenticity confirmed,” or “official proof.”

B5. Sacred respect rule

All work must be done with:

  • respectful speech and conduct,

  • minimal handling,

  • correct ritual sensitivity (as decided by custodians).


C. Risk Review (Must Complete)

C1. Object and security risk

  • Relic/object ID: __________________________

  • Location: ________________________________

  • Handling risk level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High

  • Theft / exposure risk level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
    Notes: _________________________________________________________

C2. Misinformation risk

Could the replica/model be used to mislead people?

  • ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
    Reason: _________________________________________________________

C3. Commercial risk

Is there any plan for selling, paid access, or profit?

  • ☐ No ☐ Yes (details): _________________________________________

If “Yes,” default response is reject, unless Board approves a strict exception.

C4. COI check (if external expert/company involved)

  • COI form completed (TK-049)? ☐ Yes ☐ No


D. Technical Method Check (Non-Invasive Ladder)

Tick the proposed method and safety notes:

  1. Photogrammetry (many photos, no touch)
    Safety notes: ________________________________________________

  2. Non-contact 3D scan (laser/structured light)
    Safety notes: ________________________________________________

  3. CT / X-ray scanning
    Safety notes (permissions, transport, radiation policy): _____________

  4. Contact mould/cast (high risk)
    Normally not allowed. If requested, explain why no other method works:



E. Data Governance (Who Owns the Model?)

Tick all required controls:

E1. Ownership and storage

  • ☐ HSWAGATA owns the master file

  • ☐ Secure storage location: ______________________________

  • ☐ Access list (names): __________________________________

  • ☐ Version control used (date + code): _____________________

E2. Sharing limits

  • ☐ No public release without written permission

  • ☐ No third-party sharing

  • ☐ No edits allowed without approval

  • ☐ Watermark / label embedded (if possible): “Replica / Not Original”

  • ☐ Use-only license defined (education only / exhibit only)

E3. Publication and media

  • ☐ All captions reviewed (no proof claims)

  • ☐ Any media must include the statement:
    “This is a replica/digital model. It is not the original relic.”


F. Decision & Conditions

Decision (tick one):

  • ☐ Approved (non-contact only)

  • ☐ Approved with strict limits

  • ☐ Paused (need more info / consent / COI)

  • ☐ Rejected

If approved, conditions (tick all that apply):

  • ☐ On-site only (no transport)

  • ☐ Two-person rule during scanning

  • ☐ No filming by requester

  • ☐ No public posting for ___ days until review

  • ☐ Captions must be approved

  • ☐ Model resolution limited (to reduce misuse)

  • ☐ Mandatory “Replica” label on all outputs

  • ☐ Final files returned to HSWAGATA only

Decision by: __________________ Role: __________________ Date: //____
Board / delegated approval (if required): __________________ Date: //____


G. Standard “Approval / Refusal” Wording (Copy-Paste)

G1. Approval wording (safe)

“HSWAGATA approves a non-invasive replica/3D documentation process for education and preservation purposes only. This approval does not confirm authenticity and must not be used for fundraising, trade, or proof claims. All outputs must be labelled ‘Replica / Not Original’ and follow HSWAGATA data rules.”

G2. Refusal wording (safe)

“Thank you for your request. HSWAGATA cannot approve a replica/3D scan in this case due to relic safety, consent limits, and risk of misuse. We may offer alternative education materials through official channels.”


H. Sign-off & Archive

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Head/Compliance/Security): ______________ Signature: ____
Date: ____ / ____ / ______
Archive code / file location: ______________________________________

End of Template TK-052

TK-051 (F/E) Template Title: Pressure to Declare “Authentic” Quickly — Request Letters & No-Fast-Claims Policy

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-051 (F/E)

Template Title: Pressure to Declare “Authentic” Quickly — Request Letters & No-Fast-Claims Policy

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster F (Conflicts / HGT Disputes) + Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-045 Public Science Claim Pre-Release Review

  • TK-047 “Inconclusive” Result Anger — De-escalation Script

  • TK-050 Testing Results Leaked Early — Confidentiality Control

  • TK-055 “Science Talk” Misuse Risk Assessment

  • TK-043 Consent-First Testing Rule

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

  • “All case studies” (pressure + false proof patterns)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-051 — No-Fast-Claims Policy (Core Policy)

Policy rule: HSWAGATA does not make fast public claims like “100% authentic,” “scientifically proven,” or “officially confirmed” under pressure.

We only release statements when:

  1. Custody documents are complete (chain-of-custody + witness),

  2. Consent is complete (if any testing or expert review occurred),

  3. Any scientific method limits are explained,

  4. A Board-approved wording is used, and

  5. Safety and social harmony risk is reviewed.

If a person pressures staff to claim authenticity quickly, staff must pause, record, and use this template.


A. Pressure Incident Intake

  1. Date/time received: ____ / ____ / ______ ________

  2. Who is pressuring?
    ☐ Donor ☐ Monk/nun ☐ Media ☐ Government office ☐ Heritage group ☐ Researcher ☐ Other: ________

Name/organisation (if known): _____________________________________
Contact (if provided): _____________________________________________

  1. What do they want? (tick all that apply)

  • ☐ “Write a letter that it is authentic”

  • ☐ “Announce authenticity on social media”

  • ☐ “Use lab name/logo to support authenticity”

  • ☐ “Confirm for fundraising / donation campaign”

  • ☐ “Confirm for conflict / legal fight”

  • ☐ “Confirm for exhibition permit”

  • ☐ Other: __________________________________________

  1. Deadline they demand: ☐ Today ☐ 48 hours ☐ 1 week ☐ Other: _________

  2. Risk level now: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
    Reason: _________________________________________________________

Assigned officer: _________________________ Date: //____


B. What Evidence Exists Right Now? (Quick Reality Check)

Tick what is already complete:

B1. Custody documentation

  • ☐ Relic ID recorded

  • ☐ Chain-of-custody complete

  • ☐ Mandatory witness signatures complete

  • ☐ Storage/seal records complete

B2. Consent and testing

  • ☐ Consent forms complete (if testing/expert handling occurred)

  • ☐ Non-invasive-first policy followed

  • ☐ Lab / expert MoU signed (if relevant)

  • ☐ Data governance + confidentiality controls in place

B3. Communications readiness

  • ☐ Public FAQ available

  • ☐ De-escalation plan ready

  • ☐ Board-approved wording prepared

If key boxes are not ticked: no authenticity statement is allowed.


C. No-Fast-Claims Decision (Choose One)

  • Reject request (no letter, no statement)

  • Offer neutral receipt letter only (acknowledge possession, not authenticity)

  • Offer process letter (explain steps and timeline, no authenticity claim)

  • Escalate to Board (high risk conflict or legal pressure)

Decision made by: __________________ Role: __________________ Date: //____


D. Request Letter Log (Evidence Record)

Attach copies if available.

  1. Type of request: ☐ Email ☐ Message ☐ Formal letter ☐ Phone call summary

  2. Exact words requested (quote if possible):


  1. Attachments included by requester:
    ☐ Photos ☐ Lab report ☐ Certificate ☐ Other: __________________

  2. Stored in secure folder / archive code: ___________________________


E. Safe Response Letter Templates (Choose One)

E1. Option A — Refusal (short and calm)

Subject: Response to Request for Authenticity Declaration
“Thank you for your message. HSWAGATA cannot declare authenticity quickly or under pressure. We only use careful wording after full documentation and review. We can share general education information through official channels. Thank you for understanding.”

E2. Option B — Neutral Receipt Letter (possession only)

Subject: Acknowledgement of Receipt / Custody
“This letter confirms that HSWAGATA has received and recorded an item described as: ____________. This letter does not confirm authenticity. Any assessment, if appropriate, follows our consent-first and non-invasive-first policies and requires formal review.”

E3. Option C — Process Letter (steps, not claims)

Subject: Process for Review and Communication
“HSWAGATA follows a careful process for relic-related information. This includes custody documentation, consent rules, and communication review. Some scientific methods may be limited or inconclusive. We will not publish ‘authentic’ claims without full review and official approval.”

(Select used option): ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C
Sent by (name): __________________ Date: //____
Sent via: ☐ Email ☐ Post ☐ Hand delivery ☐ Other: __________


F. Staff “Stop Script” (When Under Pressure)

Use these lines (choose 2–4):

  • “I understand the urgency. We cannot make fast authenticity claims.”

  • “We must follow documentation, consent, and Board-approved wording.”

  • “We can record your request and reply through our official process.”

  • “We can offer a neutral receipt letter, not an authenticity claim.”

  • “If you continue to pressure staff, we will end this discussion for safety.”


G. Escalation Triggers (Immediate)

Tick if any apply:

  • ☐ Threats, blackmail, or insults

  • ☐ Pressure linked to money/fundraising

  • ☐ Media interview scheduled or already posted

  • ☐ Conflict between heritage groups / temples

  • ☐ Attempts to use HSWAGATA name/logo without permission

  • ☐ Requests to hide or change facts

If ticked → escalate to: ☐ Compliance & Risk ☐ Security ☐ Board Oversight


H. Closure

Outcome: ☐ Request refused ☐ Neutral letter issued ☐ Process letter issued ☐ Escalated
Final notes (2–4 lines):



Archive code / file location: ______________________________________


I. Sign-off

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Compliance/Head): __________________ Signature: ________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

End of Template TK-051



TK-050 (E/G) Template Title: Testing Results Leaked Early — Access Logs & Confidentiality Control

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-050 (E/G)

Template Title: Testing Results Leaked Early — Access Logs & Confidentiality Control

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster G (Neglect & Relic Loss Prevention)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-045 Chain-of-Custody Not Signed — Mandatory Witness Rule

  • TK-046 Lab Method Misunderstood — Public FAQ Sheet

  • TK-047 “Inconclusive” Result Anger — De-escalation Script

  • TK-051 Testing MoU & Data Governance Sheet

  • TK-055 “Science Talk” Misuse Risk Assessment

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

  • Vinaya (truthfulness, restraint, careful speech)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-050 — Purpose

Use this template when testing results (or drafts, emails, images, or lab notes) are shared before official approval, causing:

  • rumours or conflict,

  • harm to trust,

  • pressure on custodians,

  • risk of misreading “inconclusive” or partial data.

This template helps staff:

  1. record the leak event,

  2. check access logs,

  3. control confidentiality, and

  4. issue a calm, safe response.


A. Immediate Containment (Do First)

Tick what has been done now:

  • ☐ Stop further sharing (ask all holders to pause)

  • ☐ Secure the original report files (restricted folder)

  • ☐ Identify what exactly leaked (which page/image/phrase)

  • ☐ Inform Compliance & Risk lead

  • ☐ Inform Board / Executive Director (if medium/high)

  • ☐ Preserve evidence (screenshots, URLs, message copies)

Containment notes (short):



B. Incident Overview

  1. Incident title (short): __________________________________________

  2. Date/time discovered: ____ / ____ / ______ ________

  3. Who discovered it (name/role): __________________________________

  4. What leaked? (tick)
    ☐ Full lab report ☐ Draft report ☐ Summary email ☐ Photos/scans ☐ Data table
    ☐ “Result line” only ☐ Lab name/logo ☐ Other: ______________________

  5. Where did it leak? (tick)
    ☐ Social media ☐ News ☐ Chat app group ☐ Email chain ☐ Public talk/sermon
    ☐ Internal staff group ☐ Other: _________________________________

  6. Link / evidence location (do not paste publicly; record internally):


  1. Current impact level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
    Reason: _________________________________________________________


C. Confidentiality Classification (Office Use)

Classify the leaked content:

  • Restricted (results not yet approved; high misuse risk)

  • Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive (may affect relic security, donors, conflict parties)

  • ☐ Internal only (minor draft text)

Who classified it: _______________________ Date: //_____


D. Access Log Review (Who Had Access?)

D1. Controlled Access List (write names)

List everyone who had access before the leak:

  1. __________________________ Role: __________________________

  2. __________________________ Role: __________________________

  3. __________________________ Role: __________________________
    (Add more if needed)

D2. Access method

How was the file stored/shared?

  • ☐ Printed copy

  • ☐ Email attachment

  • ☐ Cloud drive folder

  • ☐ USB / external drive

  • ☐ Messaging app file

  • ☐ Lab portal / shared link

  • ☐ Other: _______________________

D3. Key log questions (tick as you check)

  • ☐ Was a public link used?

  • ☐ Was forwarding allowed?

  • ☐ Was “view-only” used?

  • ☐ Was a password used?

  • ☐ Was the file watermarked or version-coded?

  • ☐ Were screenshots blocked? (if possible)

  • ☐ Was printing controlled?

D4. Timeline (simple)

  • Date result received: //_____

  • Date first internal share: //_____

  • Earliest public appearance (best estimate): //_____

  • Date discovered: //_____

Notes:



E. Leak Path Assessment (Do Not Accuse Without Evidence)

Select the most likely path (tick one or more):

  • ☐ Accidental forward (email / chat)

  • ☐ Screenshot taken and shared

  • ☐ Printed copy photographed

  • ☐ Public link shared wrongly

  • ☐ External party shared (lab / partner)

  • ☐ Intentional misuse (suspected)

  • ☐ Unknown

Evidence supporting this (facts only):



F. Corrective Actions (Confidentiality Control)

Tick what will be applied after this incident:

F1. Access control

  • ☐ “Need-to-know” list reduced

  • ☐ Two-person rule for viewing sensitive results

  • ☐ Replace public links with controlled access

  • ☐ Password + expiry date for any shared file

  • ☐ Disable download (view-only where possible)

  • ☐ No sharing via messaging apps

F2. Document control

  • ☐ Add version number + date on every page

  • ☐ Watermark: “DRAFT / INTERNAL / DO NOT SHARE”

  • ☐ Page numbering + total pages (e.g., 2 of 9)

  • ☐ Store master copy in one secure folder only

  • ☐ Printed copies numbered and signed-out

F3. Staff control

  • ☐ Re-brief staff on confidentiality

  • ☐ Re-sign confidentiality declaration

  • ☐ Training on “inconclusive” wording and public misunderstanding

  • ☐ Disciplinary review (only if evidence supports it)

F4. Partner / lab control

  • ☐ Remind partner of MoU confidentiality clause

  • ☐ Require partner access log (if available)

  • ☐ Restrict future sharing until safeguards improve

Assigned to (name/role): __________________ Due date: //____


G. Public/Stakeholder Response Plan (Calm + Minimal)

Choose one:

  • ☐ No public response (monitor only)

  • ☐ Short clarification note (official channel only)

  • ☐ Meeting with key stakeholders (small group)

  • ☐ Conflict de-escalation plan (if anger rises)

G1. Safe wording draft (short)

“We have seen partial information shared early. This is not an official release. Scientific results need full context and careful review. HSWAGATA will share any verified summary through official channels. We request calm and respectful speech.”

Spokesperson: __________________________ Date: //____


H. Closure

Case status: ☐ Open ☐ Under review ☐ Closed
Final summary (2–4 lines):



Archive code / file location: ______________________________________


I. Sign-off

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Compliance/Risk): __________________ Signature: ________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

End of Template TK-050



TK-049 (C/E) Template Title: External Expert Conflicts of Interest — Funding Links & COI Disclosure Form

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-049 (C/E)

Template Title: External Expert Conflicts of Interest — Funding Links & COI Disclosure Form

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster C (Institution-Building & MoUs) + Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-046 Scientific Testing Request & Ethics Checklist

  • TK-051 Relic Testing MoU & Data Governance Sheet

  • TK-027 Partner Due Diligence & Ethics Screening Form

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-049 — Purpose

This form is used when HSWAGATA works with an external expert (scientist, conservator, historian, lab staff, media expert, or advisor).
It helps us check and record Conflicts of Interest (COI), including funding links, gifts, paid roles, and personal ties that could affect neutrality.

Goal: protect truth, protect trust, and prevent misinformation.


A. Expert Identification

  1. Full name: ______________________________________________

  2. Organisation / employer: __________________________________

  3. Job title / role: __________________________________________

  4. Country: ____________________ City: _____________________

  5. Email / phone: ___________________________________________

  6. Type of expert (tick):
    ☐ Laboratory scientist ☐ Conservator ☐ Academic researcher ☐ Medical/forensic
    ☐ Heritage advisor ☐ Legal advisor ☐ Media/communications ☐ Other: __________


B. Work Requested by HSWAGATA

  1. Project / case name: _______________________________________

  2. Requested service (tick):
    ☐ Advice only (no handling)
    ☐ Report writing
    ☐ Training / lecture
    ☐ Testing design
    ☐ Lab work (if approved)
    ☐ Peer review of documents
    ☐ Media interview support
    ☐ Other: __________________________________________

  3. Expected output: ☐ Verbal ☐ Email note ☐ Written report ☐ Certificate ☐ Publication

  4. Expected time frame: From //_____ to //_____


C. Payment, Funding, and Benefits (Disclosure)

C1. Will you receive any payment from HSWAGATA for this work?
☐ No ☐ Yes
If yes:

  • Amount / rate: __________________________

  • Payment type: ☐ Fee ☐ Salary ☐ Honorarium ☐ Travel support ☐ Other: _________

C2. Will any third party pay you for this work?
☐ No ☐ Yes
If yes, name the third party and amount (if known):


C3. Gifts / benefits (past 24 months) related to relic work
Tick any received from any party linked to this case:

  • ☐ Gifts (items)

  • ☐ Cash or vouchers

  • ☐ Free travel / hotel

  • ☐ Paid speaking invitations

  • ☐ Expensive meals / entertainment

  • ☐ Religious titles / honours given for support
    Details (what, from whom, when):



D. Relationships and Interests (COI Check)

Tick Yes or No for each item. If yes, explain.

  1. Do you have a personal relationship with any party in this case?
    ☐ No ☐ Yes → Explain: _________________________________________

  2. Do you work for, consult for, or advise any party that may benefit from your conclusion?
    ☐ No ☐ Yes → Explain: _________________________________________

  3. Do you have a business interest (company, products, services) linked to relic testing, relic trade, media promotion, or museum projects?
    ☐ No ☐ Yes → Explain: _________________________________________

  4. Do you have a public position already stated about this relic or this museum (online, in media, in a publication)?
    ☐ No ☐ Yes → Explain: _________________________________________

  5. Are you part of a group that is in conflict with another stakeholder (temple group, heritage group, committee, etc.)?
    ☐ No ☐ Yes → Explain: _________________________________________

  6. Do you have funding links (grants, donors, sponsors) that could be affected by your report?
    ☐ No ☐ Yes → Explain (name funder + nature of link):


  1. Are you under any pressure to reach a certain conclusion?
    ☐ No ☐ Yes → Explain: _________________________________________


E. Required Integrity Commitments (Expert Must Agree)

Tick to confirm agreement:

  • ☐ I will speak truthfully and clearly about limits and uncertainty.

  • ☐ I will not use “HSWAGATA” name or logo in public without written approval.

  • ☐ I will not make public claims that go beyond the evidence.

  • ☐ I will not accept secret payments related to this case.

  • ☐ I will report any new conflict of interest if it appears later.

  • ☐ I understand HSWAGATA may publish a COI summary for transparency (without private data).


F. COI Risk Rating (HSWAGATA Office Use)

  1. COI level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High

  2. Main reason (short): __________________________________________

  3. Decision:
    ☐ Proceed (no limits)
    ☐ Proceed with limits (extra review / second expert / no media)
    ☐ Replace expert
    ☐ Escalate to Board / Compliance

Limits required (if any):


Reviewer name/role: _______________________ Date: //_____


G. Declaration and Signature (Expert)

I declare that the information above is true to the best of my knowledge.
I understand that hiding conflicts of interest can harm public trust and may end cooperation.

Expert name: __________________________
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______

HSWAGATA witness (mandatory): __________________ Signature: __________ Date: //____


H. Archive

Archive code / file location: ______________________________________
Status: ☐ Active ☐ Updated ☐ Archived

End of Template TK-049



TK-048 (E/A) Template Title: “Science vs Faith” Argument Grows — Talks, Sermons & Two-Language Education Talk

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-048 (E/A)

Template Title: “Science vs Faith” Argument Grows — Talks, Sermons & Two-Language Education Talk

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster A (Dhātu / Cosmology / Doctrinal Frame)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-046 Lab Method Misunderstood — Public FAQ Sheet

  • TK-047 “Inconclusive” Result Anger — De-escalation Script

  • TK-050 Science Debate Public Education Response Sheet

  • TK-064 Balanced Science–Faith Teaching & Relic Reflection Planning Sheet

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

  • Handful of Leaves (principle: teach what leads to the goal; avoid useless argument)

  • Questions of King Milinda (use careful questions; avoid confusion)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-048 — Purpose

Use this template when public discussion becomes a fight:

  • “Science is the only truth” vs “Faith is the only truth,”
    and it spreads through talks, sermons, classes, or social media.

This template helps HSWAGATA deliver a calm education talk in two languages (Language 1 + Language 2).
The talk protects peace, avoids insults, and avoids fake “proof claims.”


A. Situation Intake

  1. Where is the argument growing?
    ☐ Museum visitors ☐ Temple sermons ☐ School talk ☐ Social media ☐ News ☐ Other: _______

  2. Main trigger (tick):
    ☐ Lab method misunderstood ☐ “Inconclusive” result ☐ Fake proof online ☐ Testing refusal ☐ Other: _______

  3. Common statements heard (write 2–3):




  1. Risk level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
    Reason: ________________________________________________________

  2. Assigned education lead: __________________ Date: //____


B. Two-Language Talk Plan (Logistics)

B1. Audience

☐ Lay visitors ☐ Youth/students ☐ Donors ☐ Monastic audience ☐ Mixed public

B2. Format

☐ Short talk 10–15 min ☐ Sermon segment ☐ Workshop 30–45 min ☐ Q&A session

B3. Languages

  • Language 1: _______________________

  • Language 2: _______________________
    Interpreter needed? ☐ Yes ☐ No
    Interpreter name (if any): ______________________

B4. Speakers

  • Main speaker: _______________________ Role: _____________________

  • Co-speaker / moderator: __________________ Role: ________________

  • Doctrinal advisor (if needed): _________________________________


C. Core Message Rules (Must Follow)

Tick to confirm:

  • ☐ We do not insult science or faith.

  • ☐ We do not promise “proof.”

  • ☐ We do not attack any group or person.

  • ☐ We speak for peace and understanding.

  • ☐ We encourage questions in a respectful way.

  • ☐ We keep relic protection first (no harm).


D. Two-Language Education Talk Script (Ready-to-Use)

Instructions: Read each part first in Language 1, then in Language 2.
Keep voice slow. Use simple words.

D1. Opening (Respect + Calm)

Language 1:
“Today we talk about relics, science, and faith. We do not want fighting. We want peace. Science and faith can work together when we use correct words and respect.”

Language 2:
[Insert same meaning in Language 2]


D2. Simple meaning of “faith”

Language 1:
“Faith means trust and respect. It supports good actions, calm mind, and moral life. Faith is not the same as shouting or blind anger.”

Language 2:


D3. Simple meaning of “science”

Language 1:
“Science means careful study with methods. Science can help with conservation and education. But science also has limits. Not every sacred question can become a lab answer.”

Language 2:


D4. Stop the false battle

Language 1:
“It is not ‘science versus faith.’ It is ‘careful learning and respectful practice.’ If we fight, we lose peace. If we speak with kindness, we protect the Buddha’s teaching.”

Language 2:


D5. Key teaching point (Handful of Leaves principle)

Language 1:
“The Buddha taught what leads to the goal and reduces suffering. We should not waste energy in useless arguing. We should focus on what brings peace and wisdom.”

Language 2:


D6. What we can say about tests (safe wording)

Language 1:
“Some tests can give limited information. Some results can be ‘inconclusive.’ That does not mean ‘fake’ and does not mean ‘proven true.’ It means we must be honest and careful.”

Language 2:


D7. Relic protection comes first

Language 1:
“Relics are sacred and fragile. We do not harm them for curiosity. We use a non-invasive-first policy. We use consent-first rules.”

Language 2:


D8. How to ask questions (Milinda-style: clear, respectful)

Language 1:
“If you have questions, ask clearly and gently. Bring your sources. We will check step by step. We welcome sincere questions, not attacks.”

Language 2:


D9. Closing (Peace pledge)

Language 1:
“May our words be true and kind. May our actions protect the relics and protect harmony. Thank you.”

Language 2:



E. Guided Q&A Notes (Moderator Use)

E1. Safe answers (short)

  • “We will explain the method in simple words.”

  • “We do not claim more than the evidence.”

  • “We protect relics from harm.”

  • “Please avoid rumours. Use official channels.”

E2. If someone becomes aggressive

Use one line:

  • “I hear your concern. Please speak calmly. If not, we will pause for safety.”

E3. “Do Not Say” list

  • “Science proves it 100%.”

  • “Faith means you must not question.”

  • “Only fools doubt.”

  • Any insult to other religions, labs, or monks.


F. Follow-Up Actions

Tick what will be produced after the talk:

  • ☐ Handout: Public FAQ (TK-046)

  • ☐ Short post on official channel (approved wording only)

  • ☐ Training for staff/volunteers on safe language

  • ☐ Next talk date scheduled: ____ / ____ / ______


G. Approval for Use

  • Department Head: __________________ Date: //____

  • Compliance/Risk: __________________ Date: //____

  • Spokesperson confirmed: __________________ Date: //____


H. Archive

Archive code / file location: ______________________________________
Status: ☐ Active ☐ Updated ☐ Archived

End of Template TK-048



TK-047 (E/F) Template Title: “Inconclusive” Result Causes Anger — Meeting Notes & De-escalation Script

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION PRIVATE MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: TK-047 (E/F)

Template Title: “Inconclusive” Result Causes Anger — Meeting Notes & De-escalation Script

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science/Testing/Misinformation) + Cluster F (Conflicts / HGT Disputes)

Linked Templates / Policies:

  • TK-046 Lab Method Misunderstood — Public FAQ Sheet

  • TK-050 Public Education Response Sheet

  • TK-055 “Science Talk” Misuse Risk Assessment

  • TK-066 Conflict Incident Overview & Stakeholder Mapping

  • Institutional Policies for Relic Stewardship (HSWAGATA)

  • “All case studies” (conflict + false proof patterns)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


TK-047 — Purpose

Use this template when a scientific or expert result is “inconclusive”, and it causes:

  • anger, shouting, threats, blame, or public conflict,

  • accusations of lying, cover-up, or disrespect,

  • pressure to “prove” the relic quickly.

This template has:

  1. Meeting notes structure (so we record facts), and

  2. A de-escalation script (so staff speak calmly and safely).


A. Incident Intake (Short Facts)

  1. Date/time: ____ / ____ / ______ ________

  2. Location: ☐ Museum ☐ Temple ☐ Online call ☐ Public event ☐ Other: ________

  3. People involved (names/roles if known):


  4. What result caused anger? (tick)
    ☐ “Inconclusive” lab report
    ☐ “No clear match” / “cannot confirm”
    ☐ Method limits explained (public rejects)
    ☐ Delay or refusal to test

  5. Trigger event (1 sentence):


Risk level now: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
(High = threats, crowd pressure, media escalation, or security risk)

Assigned lead officer: ______________________ Date: //____


B. Meeting Notes (Record, Don’t Argue)

B1. Meeting type

☐ Quick calm talk (under 10 min)
☐ Formal meeting (scheduled)
☐ Emergency meeting (anger already high)

B2. Main complaint (write exact words if possible)



B3. What the museum said (facts only, no emotions)



B4. What the public group wanted

Tick all that apply:

  • ☐ “Prove it now”

  • ☐ “Name the lab / show full report”

  • ☐ “Do DNA / Carbon-14”

  • ☐ “Blame a person / remove a staff member”

  • ☐ “Public apology”

  • ☐ “Money refund / donation dispute”

  • ☐ “Media interview now”

  • ☐ Other: _______________________

B5. Signs of escalation

Tick all that apply:

  • ☐ Raised voices

  • ☐ Personal insults

  • ☐ Threats (verbal/online)

  • ☐ Crowd gathers

  • ☐ Filming without permission

  • ☐ Religious insult or hate speech

  • ☐ Attempt to touch/reach relic area

  • ☐ Media contact already active

B6. Safety actions taken

  • ☐ Move discussion away from relic area

  • ☐ Two-person staff rule used

  • ☐ Security informed

  • ☐ Relic area locked / restricted

  • ☐ Meeting ended for safety
    Notes: _________________________________________________________

B7. Outcome

  • ☐ Calmed and agreed to follow-up

  • ☐ Unresolved but no threat

  • ☐ Escalated to leadership/board

  • ☐ Escalated to security/legal
    Next follow-up date: ____ / ____ / ______


C. De-escalation Script (Staff Use)

Goal: calm the situation, protect people, protect relics, protect truth.
Tone: slow, respectful, not defensive.

C1. Opening (acknowledge feelings)

  • “I hear that you feel angry and disappointed.”

  • “Thank you for speaking directly. We will listen.”

  • “We want peace and clarity, not argument.”

C2. Ground rule (safety and respect)

  • “Let us speak one at a time.”

  • “Please no shouting and no personal attacks.”

  • “For safety, we cannot discuss this inside the relic area.”

C3. Explain “inconclusive” in simple words

  • “Inconclusive means the method did not give a clear answer.”

  • “It does not mean ‘fake’ and it does not mean ‘proven true.’”

  • “It means: we must be careful and not claim more than the evidence.”

C4. Reduce the ‘prove now’ pressure

  • “We cannot promise a quick proof.”

  • “Some tests can damage a relic. We do not harm sacred objects.”

  • “We follow a consent-first and non-invasive-first policy.”

C5. Offer a calm next step (choices)

Pick one or more:

  • “We can share a short public note explaining what ‘inconclusive’ means.”

  • “We can schedule a meeting with a small group and a senior advisor.”

  • “We can provide a written FAQ about lab methods.”

  • “If there is a formal request, we will review it through our ethics process.”

C6. If they accuse the museum of lying

  • “I understand why you suspect that. Still, we must speak with facts.”

  • “If you have documents or sources, please share them. We will record them.”

  • “We will not attack any person. We will verify step by step.”

C7. If they demand names or full reports immediately

  • “Some details may be restricted for privacy and safety.”

  • “We can share what is appropriate through official channels.”

  • “We will not release partial data that can be misused.”

C8. If the situation is getting dangerous (exit line)

  • “We will pause now for safety.”

  • “We will respond in writing through our official process.”

  • “We are ending this meeting now. Thank you.”


D. “Do Not Say” List (High-risk sentences)

Staff must avoid:

  • “You are wrong / stupid.”

  • “Science proves it fully.”

  • “This lab is the final judge.”

  • “We will test anything you want.”

  • “We will expose the person online.”

  • Any blame statement without verified evidence.


E. Follow-Up Actions (Choose and Assign)

  • ☐ Prepare Public FAQ (TK-046)

  • ☐ Prepare written clarification note (TK-050)

  • ☐ Stakeholder mapping + conflict plan (TK-066)

  • ☐ Media response plan (spokesperson only)

  • ☐ Internal review: what wording caused confusion?
    Assigned to: ____________________ Due date: //____


F. Sign-off & Archive

Prepared by: __________________________ Signature: ________________
Reviewed by (Head/Compliance/Security): ______________ Signature: ____
Date: ____ / ____ / ______
Archive code / file location: ______________________________________